Talk:M-116 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- P C  B  23:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * There are a couple of prose issues listed below.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will put the article on hold for the issues below.
 * Perhaps a sentence or more in the lead about the realignments.
 * Done.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * I cannot locate Lincolen Lake.
 * Which lakeshore? Michigan or Lincolen (It might be Lincoln)?
 * Fixed the typo.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * Through sand dunes? So highways can go within dunes?
 * Yes, they can. You're reading that statement too literally, but yes a highway can run between and through the dunes area.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * Is acres supposed to be converted to square kilometres or hectares?
 * I don't know that it matters, but I dropped the km2 to let it pick, and convert picked hectares. *shrugs*  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * "May or June" needs to be rephrased. Make it sound sure while still being factually correct.
 * You can't. Based on the map dates, that's the most specific that be written based on the sources.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * A new alignment to M-116? If so, please clarify that M-116 was the route that was realigned.
 * Since the paragraph has not mentioned anything but M-116 to that point, context says that yes. Further explanation would be both redundant and superfluous.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * Perhaps clarify that the extension east along Ludington Avenue was a result of the US 10 shift?-- P C  B  23:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Once again, the context of the change is clear, and inserting that addition would be redundant and superfluous.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * So much for your very long vocabulary; I am going to pass the article. -- P C  B  01:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * A new alignment to M-116? If so, please clarify that M-116 was the route that was realigned.
 * Since the paragraph has not mentioned anything but M-116 to that point, context says that yes. Further explanation would be both redundant and superfluous.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * Perhaps clarify that the extension east along Ludington Avenue was a result of the US 10 shift?-- P C  B  23:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Once again, the context of the change is clear, and inserting that addition would be redundant and superfluous.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * So much for your very long vocabulary; I am going to pass the article. -- P C  B  01:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)