Talk:M-120 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Admr Boltz  00:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Second Muskegon link in the Major junctions section should be unlinked per WP:OVERLINK.
 * Done.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * Images would be nice, but are not a GA requirement. You may wanna include a copy of an old map for the previous routing of the highway. I would recommend the portion that links from Ohio Route 120.
 * "In the aftermath of the reroute, the M-20 designation was moved to run from Hesperia to New Era."
 * Done.  Imzadi 1979  → 
 * "That concurrency was removed in 1978." link concurrency.
 * "ran concurrently" in the previous sentence is already linked to that article.  Imzadi 1979  →   00:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Passing --  Admr Boltz  00:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)