Talk:M-122 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: &mdash;  P C  B  14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Perhaps a reference for that people had to take the ferry in the route description?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Putting article on hold for minor issue.
 * I added a citation for that sentence, which is not any of the following: "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, [or] contentious material relating to living persons. Those are the only items required to have citations under the GA criteria. Also note, I reverted your addition of periods to the lead sentence of the article; the Chicago Manual of Style no longer requires them and our MoS is following suit.  Imzadi 1979  →   18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Putting article on hold for minor issue.
 * I added a citation for that sentence, which is not any of the following: "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, [or] contentious material relating to living persons. Those are the only items required to have citations under the GA criteria. Also note, I reverted your addition of periods to the lead sentence of the article; the Chicago Manual of Style no longer requires them and our MoS is following suit.  Imzadi 1979  →   18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I added a citation for that sentence, which is not any of the following: "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, [or] contentious material relating to living persons. Those are the only items required to have citations under the GA criteria. Also note, I reverted your addition of periods to the lead sentence of the article; the Chicago Manual of Style no longer requires them and our MoS is following suit.  Imzadi 1979  →   18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)