Talk:M-149 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Starstriker7(Talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Lots of map references that are hard for me to check, but I will trust them, as I did on the last one I reviewed.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As with the other, to add images would be awesome; it is hard for me to envision these highways, as I can imagine it would be for other out-of-staters as well. But it does not keep this one from becoming a good article. Congratulations on rolling another one off of the assembly line. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As with the other, to add images would be awesome; it is hard for me to envision these highways, as I can imagine it would be for other out-of-staters as well. But it does not keep this one from becoming a good article. Congratulations on rolling another one off of the assembly line. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * As with the other, to add images would be awesome; it is hard for me to envision these highways, as I can imagine it would be for other out-of-staters as well. But it does not keep this one from becoming a good article. Congratulations on rolling another one off of the assembly line. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)