Talk:M-17 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the lead, you say "The changes made to the highways in Washtenaw County even spawned BUS M-17, a business loop for 11 years." Why is it "even"?  "Even" makes it sound like this was an unusual phenomenon...  And maybe say a business loop between x year and y year, rather than for 11 years.
 * In the Route description section, you say "West of this cloverleaf interchange, Washtenaw Avenue west of this interchange is Business Loop Interstate 94" One of these "west"s needs to be removed, I think.
 * In the History section, you say "US and US 112"  I think there might be a number missing here.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

A couple of comments regarding prose, so I am putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Copyediting is done. Let me know if you have any other feedback. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything else looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response! Dana boomer (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)