Talk:M-221 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Starstriker7(Talk) 23:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I will review this article. --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * People from Michigan probably won't know what a state trunkline highway is. I count myself among that group. Can you define it briefly?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Is it possible to acquire an image of the highway? If not, that's alright, although it seems like something that seems worthy of adding.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just two comments to address, no biggie. Once you do, this article should be good to go. --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to acquire an image of the highway? If not, that's alright, although it seems like something that seems worthy of adding.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just two comments to address, no biggie. Once you do, this article should be good to go. --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Replies:
 * 1) The term is defined by way of the link in the first sentence. This has been acceptable in 7 FAs and 100 other GAs already.
 * 2) No freely available images have been found, and I live 5–6 hours away from that part of the state. Sorry, but we're out of luck in the photo department for now.

Thank you for the review!  Imzadi 1979  →   23:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, thank you for the clarifications and replies. This article looks ready to pass! --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)