Talk:M-29 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Good article review

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This article is comprehensive and all, but it's got way too little references. I suggest removing some of the MHighways refs for maps and stuff. On hold till then. Mitch 32contribs 22:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC) ~Map sources added, per request. Imzadi1979 (talk) 23:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Article now meets criteria. Mitch 32contribs 23:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

The lead section on this article is still far too short and does not adequately summarize the article. It needs to be expanded if this article can keep it's GA status. Please see WP:LEAD for information on improving this section. Dr. Cash (talk) 23:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)