Talk:M-44 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  01:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I am placing the article on hold for one minor concern.  Dough 48  72  01:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "and intersects with its sibling, Connector M-44,", "sibling" sounds colloquial here, can another word such as auxiliary route be used?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  01:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)