Talk:M-59 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  19:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The route description is written in the wrong direction. It should be west-to-east, not east-to-west. In the history, there are two consecutive sentences that begin with "The east end". Can one of these instances be changed?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I do not think reference 3 fully supports the first sentence of the route description. It could be used in conjunction with another reference such as a map.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Can a little more descriptive information be added to the lead? In addition, the route description seems short for a 60-mile road. Can information about the physical environment and attractions the route passes by be added, in addition to major intersections?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will put the article on hold to allow for some fixes.  Dough 48  72  19:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * How's that?  Imzadi  1979   →  21:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good, so I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  01:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * How's that?  Imzadi  1979   →  21:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good, so I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  01:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)