Talk:M-73 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- P C  B  00:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Before I pass the article, I would like one small issue addressed. The issue is that it is unclear what the road is like north of the state line. It is briefly mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph of the route description that it is not a two-lane rural highway, but I am not clear what it is at the state line.
 * It's all two-lane highway. I tweaked that sentence to clarify that the exception is to the terrain, not the type of roadway.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. I think the article is ready to pass. -- P C  B  02:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Before I pass the article, I would like one small issue addressed. The issue is that it is unclear what the road is like north of the state line. It is briefly mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph of the route description that it is not a two-lane rural highway, but I am not clear what it is at the state line.
 * It's all two-lane highway. I tweaked that sentence to clarify that the exception is to the terrain, not the type of roadway.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. I think the article is ready to pass. -- P C  B  02:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. I think the article is ready to pass. -- P C  B  02:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)