Talk:M-75 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the History section, the sentence "The M-75 designation is left unaltered as US 27 between Gaylord and Indian River is converted to a freeway and renamed I-75 in 1962." is confusing me. I'm really not sure what you're trying to say.  Could you try to rewrite it an clarify, please?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

One comment about prose, so I am putting the article on hold. Other than that, a very nice article! Drop me a note here on the review page or on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * See if the rewrite works better for you now. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That looks much better! Thank you for your quick response.  I'm passing the article now. Dana boomer (talk) 00:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)