Talk:M-93 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Can some more detail about the physical environment the route passes through be added to the route description? The current route description seems a little dry as it mainly describes intersections with other roads.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one concern with the route description, otherwise the article looks good.  Dough 48  72  18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * How's that?  Imzadi  1979   →  19:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The route description looks better, so I will pass the article.  Dough 48  72  19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one concern with the route description, otherwise the article looks good.  Dough 48  72  18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * How's that?  Imzadi  1979   →  19:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The route description looks better, so I will pass the article.  Dough 48  72  19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)