Talk:M. Elizabeth Cannon

Enbridge scandal
The tone of this page seems to be very biased in favour of Cannon. Why is there no mention of the enbridge scandal which was concluded by the teaching union to be a conflict of interest? This seems to have been wiped from wikipedia entirely!

-CC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.222.64 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M. Elizabeth Cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706164351/http://www.acad-eng-gen.ca/e/members.cfm to http://www.acad-eng-gen.ca/e/members.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Article clean up
I have drastically pruned this article which was not only written as a blatant advertorial, but plagiarised verbatim from several sources, which I have now listed as references. As such it was also a copyright violation. The previous completely unacceptable version was pasted here (twice) from an IP resolving to the University of Calgary,. I have removed the "advertising" tag from the article as this no longer applies, but have added three others:
 * It requires third party references. At moment the only references are to official biographies and press releases.
 * The bare urls in the references need formatting
 * It is seriously underlinked, a result of the anonymous University of Calgary "editor" who pasted over the original version of this article with the promotional copyvio

I have also added to two further sources to the "External links" section which can be used to expand the article and improve the referencing. Note that any further attempts to restore the copyvio and promotionalism will be reverted on sight. Voceditenore (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)