Talk:M. H. Krishna

Organizing the article
The article appears to be well researched and written but two sections are rather mysterious - there is a "bibliography" which is not the list of publications written by M.H. Krishna nor does it appear to be sources to read. And it includes references at the end which is again unclear. Further the "citations" is mysterious. References are citations, in some cases people use footnotes and record frequently cited sources in a references or citations section. I hope the people who have read through the sources can reorganize it to something more in line with the usual style. Shyamal (talk) 05:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. There are some discrepancies in the observations listed above.
 * The review states that "There is a Bibliography". In the entire article on M. H. Krishna, no Bibliography Section seems to be present. Of course it is a different matter that it could use a Bibliography section, but the fact of the matter remains that this article at this point of time does NOT have a Bibliography section yet.
 * The list of publications/ works by M. H. Krishna are clearly listed in the "Contributions" section.
 * References Section, rightly, includes citations from books (which are mentioned), from Footnotes (the books and page numbers where these appear are mentioned as well), From Online Catalogues (like WORDLCAT which are reputable and accepted sources) and other websites where extensive biographical information is already provided. Bugs2beatles 11:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC) (Bugs2beatles (talk))