Talk:MDaemon

Notability dispute
Currently, we've got six independent sources about MDaemon, explicitly not just repeating press releases but providing significant coverage and reviews over more than a decade. This is a lot more than similar articles provide. In my humble opinion, the SecuritySpace survey alone establishes notability.

Exactly when do we have sufficient sources? With ten? Twenty? --Zac67 (talk) 17:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and removed the maintenance tag for now. With a non-enthusiastic "Weak keep" in the latest AfD discussion I am hopefully not seen as biased, but the latest consensus was relatively clear. Of course eventual substantial concerns should be adressed, but such concerns should be raised on the article talkpage in a more concrete manner first. GermanJoe (talk) 12:22, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Mdaemon Technologies Ransomware Alert.png