Talk:ME (band)

Stylism
Anyone object to the stylism being removed from the title and have Me (band) to help readers? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ME (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927053441/http://epub02.publitas.com/ASOS/15/magazine.php?spread=40 to http://epub02.publitas.com/ASOS/15/magazine.php?spread=40
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928013542/http://www.newworldartists.net/news/index.cfm?action=view&id=315 to http://newworldartists.net/news/index.cfm?action=view&id=315
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927053441/http://epub02.publitas.com/ASOS/15/magazine.php?spread=40 to http://epub02.publitas.com/ASOS/15/magazine.php?spread=40

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

ME (band) capitalisation
I've reverted part of an edit you made to the lede of ME (band). Whilst I have no preference on the capitalisation of the article title, we do need to be consistent throughout the article, and your edit merely changed the first instance of the band name in the article without changing any others or moving the article. The band themselves seem to be confused on the name as their official Facebook and Twitter pages contradict. However, the article itself does says 'originally written as "[Me]"...now "ME"' with a reference to a magazine article (which seems to support the status quo). Llew Mawr (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * why do you think consistency is required? The rules on titles are much stricter than on article content. Having said that there's no objection to you removing the stylism through the article. But as far as the title goes we don't use WP:CAPS for stylisms only for acronyms, cf WP:MOSTM. This isn't an acronym. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)