Talk:MICROSCOPE

Requested move 4 January 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 14:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

MICROSCOPE (satellite) → MICROSCOPE – no disambiguation needed. Can't move myself as the target is on the title blacklist. mfb (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This would be controversial, per microscope. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose - the title is too ambiguous with Microscope. Interstellarity (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Support Per WP:DIFFCAPS, particularly the MAVEN example, which is exactly analogous to this one.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. Capitalisation is enough to differentiate. J I P  &#124; Talk 11:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per ZXCVBNM, how could this be controversial, the difference is very distinct so why would someone use ALL CAPS to search for a generic term? Note that there is also MicroScope that is far more subtle but still probably passed DIFFCAPS.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 20:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.