Talk:MIDI tuning standard

When provided a correction for quantisation error, a 'Woodstone' struck the work aside with a crude reversion to 'theory'. Given that the MIDI numbers are not exactly SI units, but are a computer protocol matter, then rounding, while an 'implementation matter', is entirely relevant to the core theory in this case. As the stricken part of the entry describing the correction remains on record for those who want to find it, it should become apparent to them that any correction to the formula that guarantees accuracy independently of computer platform, while also not compromising accuracy, is a little deeper than an 'implementation matter'. If Mister Woodstone doesn't like it because it looks fractionally less tidy than his flawed ideal, then perhaps, having seen the results of tested effort to correct it, he could use his evidently deep knowledge of Wikipedia to place the correction in better context rather that strike it out as if it never had reason to exist.


 * The way the formula was edited resulted in nonsense. is equal to 1. Definitely too large for the purpose of quantisation error. Perhaps multiplying by  was intended. But that should not be under the log and factor 12. And it should perhaps be  not to disturb the 14th binary digit. Finally the remark should not be under the definition of d, but in the formatting section. Anyway the addition was much too confused for inclusion. &minus;Woodstone (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The article currently claims Pianoteq supports MTS. Pianoteq does not support MTS. Pianoteq supports multichannel pitch bend retuning and it supports SCL+KBM files but not MTS. Please do NOT add instruments to the list of support without verifying that they actually support MTS. Do not assume that instruments that are retunable in some way support MTS, this is not usually the case. Thank you. Xj (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MIDI tuning standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130628023426/https://java.net/projects/gervill/pages/Home to https://java.net/projects/gervill/pages/Home
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130628023426/https://java.net/projects/gervill/pages/Home to https://java.net/projects/gervill/pages/Home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)