Talk:MIM

Reversionary edits
user:bkonrad: please stop edit warring. Please read Talk:TNA because the reasoning I give there is directly relevant to some of the changes I made to this page. Using my edit here as a baseline, please discuss here, in detail and not by repetition of curt phrases, why you think changes are required. If we cannot agree because there is no applicable policy then we can take further steps to resolve. I have taken time to outline my reasons and stop editwarring, please now do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have replied Talk:TNA. older ≠ wiser 09:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have made an edit along the lines of that to TNA since the situation is broadly similar. The edit is to roll the page back to the baseline before the reverts, and delete (MIM) wherever it is not necessary, ie where it is clear to a reader why the entry is on the page (that is not every entry). user:bkonrad disagreed at Talk:TNA with my interpretation of WP:MOSDAB (to ICAO codes etc) but agreed not to revert based on that alone. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)