Talk:MLB 10: The Show

Bugs/Glitches
The game is literally full of bugs and glitches, more so than any other sports game out there to the point where it can be considered a broken game that was absolutely not ready for release. It's widely reported/described by customers voicing their concerns in forums, yet no legitimate source is picking up on the issues and warning future potential buyers. A section in this article should definitely describe the controversy as it's more pertinent than the regular description of the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.150.16 (talk) 21:26, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I have this game and haven't found any significant bugs/glitches, I think this could be posted by someone who is a hater of the game, If you look at IGN or any other reputable gaming web page they is no mention of major bugs/glitches. I suggest we remove this post completely.

Many of the mentioned bugs/glitches have been fixed with the second patch. Some however, like the Tropicana Field freeze bug, remain. As for the guy who says he owns the game, search those websites' discussion boards for "franchise issues" or "tropicana field" and you'll find hundreds of posts regarding the bugs. You either don't "have" the game or haven't played it enough before the second patch came out to have seen the issues, but they were/are definetaly there. I think the section should include a part which explains the two patches that the developers put out, and how they fixed many issues as people whose PS3's aren't connected to the internet should know that they have to download the patches for their game to be fixed. Furthermore, the fact that the game had such severe glitches in the first place is reason enough to keep a section about it. Not to mention that the first patch came out the day after the game was made available to the public, which never usually happens. That in itself can be construed as it having been released prematurely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.150.16 (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Article Bias
This article is pretty clearly written by the company's PR people. Surely wikipedia is better off with no article than such a clearly biased one?Sbenzell (talk) 06:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a copyright violation, taken from other websites' descriptions of the game. Spell4yr (talk) 02:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)