Talk:MOESI protocol

Copy/Paste?
Hi all. I discovered when consulting the source that the bullet points describing the states are partly or in full copied from the source. I don't know if this accounts to a copyright violation (only sections and with an attribution at the beginning, but mixed into normal text without quotes). Does this need a rewrite or if this is fine? Advice by an expert/admin/power user would be appreciated. Padyx (talk) 12:19, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It's been replaced with earlier text. It was a clearly violation of our copyright policy in 2006 - although attribution was given, it was copied verbatim at the time. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20110719185356/http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/24593.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Yet, the current reference only exists at the top and the link doesn't work. I don't have time, but could someone update the article to include references in the appropriate locations?152.7.224.4 (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)