Talk:MOL (company)

Neeile = Neelie
Minor typo should be corrected together with a working link. Thanks. 80.83.157.139 (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Renaming
Could we move this page to MOL (company)? Although MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. is an official name of the company, this name is not widely used in English. WP:UCN states that the most common name what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject should be used. It also states that page names should be as simple as possible. The most common name for this company is MOL. As we have the disambiguation page Mol and MOL redirects to Mol, the article should be renamed MOL (company). Beagel (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Since no one has objected, I have moved it.--Aervanath (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on MOL Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303121301/http://www.coface.ua/CofacePortal/ShowBinary/BEA%20Repository/UA/en_EN/pages/home/who_we_are/ne/_docs/Booklet%20Top%20500.pdf to http://www.coface.ua/CofacePortal/ShowBinary/BEA%20Repository/UA/en_EN/pages/home/who_we_are/ne/_docs/Booklet%20Top%20500.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321190822/https://client.bse.hu/menun_kivuli/portlets/companyprofile?security=518 to https://client.bse.hu/menun_kivuli/portlets/companyprofile?security=518
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530002244/http://www.nabucco-pipeline.com/cms/upload/press_release/Press%20Release%20Nabucoo%20e%20-%20RWE%20joins%20Nabucco%20consortium%20as%20sixth%20partner.pdf to http://www.nabucco-pipeline.com/cms/upload/press_release/Press%20Release%20Nabucoo%20e%20-%20RWE%20joins%20Nabucco%20consortium%20as%20sixth%20partner.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091009203137/http://www.pesa.com.au/publications/pesa_news/mar_07/pesanews_8628.html to http://www.pesa.com.au/publications/pesa_news/mar_07/pesanews_8628.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

"placed 402 on the Fortune Global 500 list of the world's largest companies in 2013 with a revenue equal to one fifth of Hungary's GDP at the time"
Extremely doubtful and suspicious, somebody's calculation is wrong. Hungary is not an oil rich country like Russia or the Saudis such that just one company could claim 20% of the annual GDP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4C4E:24A5:B00:E2F3:66FC:6E00:ED7A (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Sections with subjective wording in tone of an advertisement
I take issue with the wording of multiple parts of the article. There seems to be an extensive use of subjective terms in praise of the company ("leading", "state-of-the-art") as well as, for some reason, descriptions of the company's vague plans into the future, which seem highly irrelevant: "...to prepare the company for times beyond the fuel age, the company has set the goal to become a broader goods and services provider" This isn't a press briefing. If such statements are to be had in an encyclopaedia entry, they need to be, at the very least, detailed and specific actions or steps of the company should be noted. Or something.

I will do my best to remove parts I consider problematic but I cannot help but feel much of the article needs to be reviewed for truthfulness. — Soggy Pandas (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)