Talk:MP3 player

wording
Right now the article says it's a "misnomer" to call an MP3 player an MP3 player. I don't think "misnomer" is the best word here. Going by the dictionary definition of misnomer, this would only make sense if the MP3 player did not play MP3s at all (as opposed to playing more than just MP3s, as it does.) 95.151.70.107 (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

wording
sugest:

"Other formats are open source, such as Vorbis, FLAC, and Speex (all part of the Ogg open multimedia project)."

should be:

"Other formats are free and open, such as Vorbis, FLAC, and Speex (all part of the Ogg open multimedia project)."

because the reference implementation of a format can be open source, not the format itself, which doesn't have source code. People are free to make non-open source implementations of any of the formats mentioned above.

first
It's "commonly held" that the rio was the first mp3 player, but User:68.38.80.92 added the thing about the Eiger player being first. I'd not heard of it, but a quick google finds several contemporanoues reviews such as http://business.fortunecity.com/tisch/493/MPManReview.htm, which do indeed say that the Eiger was on sale first, at least in Asia. -- John Fader

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MP3 player. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041211122155/http://www.podcastingnews.com/forum/links.php to http://www.podcastingnews.com/forum/links.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 18 February 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. If this is revisited in the future, I'd suggest including additional evidence to back up the proposal. Dekimasu よ! 22:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

MP3 player → Digital Audio Player – Its correct technical name is Digital Audio Player, MP3 is just a format which all of them support it but are not limited to it, specially in recent years. Editor-1 (talk) 12:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * oppose, of course it is a digital audio player, however, mp3 is the quintessential format that everyone uses, at the point where, non-technical people would refer to formats even as mp3. It became basically a catch-all for mp3s. also, primary sticking point. Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose per COMMONNAME. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose per common name. Corky  15:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose per common name. Lepricavark (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * comment Although I said "its technical name" but the fact is "Digital Audio Player" is also common!!

Editor-1 (talk) 07:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

AfD of Capsule speaker
More opinions welcome at Articles for deletion/Capsule speaker. Is capsule speaker a generic term for a now-notable device, or simply a brandname from X-mini? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)