Talk:MS Princess Seaways

Merge
I don’t believe that it is a good idea at all to merge any of the stated articles because TT-line is the owner of the ships not the ships them selves. I agree the spirit of Tasmania article has moved away from it original purpose going to much in to TT-line and not enough to the ships but it still needs to remain independent to TT-line as it is about the ships not the company so with saying that I think the devil cat should not be on that page because it has nothing to do with spirit of Tasmania but TT-line and I think the page could speak more on the ships them self’s maybe even a disambiguation with each ship having its own page as is the case with the original spirit, Abel Tasman and the devil cat. Merging these articles would be like merging the Toyota corolla with Toyota just because Toyota makes the car it dose not mean all the cars history and specs should be put on that page. Mbruce1 06:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * If anything the article should be merged with M/S Princess of Norway and given that name. Red Fox 14:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah well I think that’s what will end up happening but I will leave it for now and see what happens Mbruce1 03:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd agree that it seems silly to have two articles about the same vessel, just because it changed owners, names and routes. Is there an established precendent in a maritime wikiproject for this? That's a support for merging Spirit of Tasmania (first ship) to M/S Princess of Norway. However, merging a group of ships to their owner's article seems odd, especially if Abel Tasman (ship) and Devil Cat are not proposed to be included. I oppose that kind of merge, and would prefer to split each ship to its own article. --Scott Davis Talk 13:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn’t have any major issues if this was merged with M/S Princess of Norway but the current merge tag is to merge this article with the Spirit of Tasmania and TT-Line (Australia) articles which I think is absolutely ridiculous ! Mbruce1 14:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

new name
Dfds has given new name - Princess seaways after her maintence this month i can confirm the source because i got e-mail from DFDS cause i asked about the king seaways which renamed last month

quote: Princess of Norway will be renamed PRINCESS SEAWAYS once her maintenance dry-docking has been completed later this month. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsdworker (talk • contribs) 13:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on MS Princess Seaways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060428135135/http://mitchellstasmanianferrysite.fpic.co.uk:80/ to http://mitchellstasmanianferrysite.fpic.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MS Princess Seaways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024161824/http://www.dfds.com/DFDSGROUP/EN/Press/FjordLine to http://www.dfds.com/DFDSGROUP/EN/Press/FjordLine

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)