Talk:MVRDV

Controversy section
i expect someone to add to the controversy section in the near future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.246.79 (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You mean you expect the controversy to grow? :) I added a reference, but for anybody working on this please be aware of due weight and avoid recentism. --Elekhh (talk) 06:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MVRDV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614115722/http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=587 to http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=587
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614115139/http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=371 to http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=371

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Citations / Buzzwords / History
There's been a lot of work to add citations, many from non-primary sources, in this article, so I've taken the citations warning template away.

There are still a few sections where the language is abstract / buzzwordy. These need better explanation.

The history section could also be more elegant - largely a long list of projects without context at the moment

Xcia0069 (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Notable Works
The text of the Notable Works reads as if it's been taken direct from the firm's website Xcia0069 (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)