Talk:M Ravi

Assault and suspension
The sourced material on the assault and suspension has been removed seven times (once by an IP and six times by the same named editor). It has been restored by five different named editors. Is there some valid reason this material should not be in the article?

It seems well sourced, and I do not see an obvious WP:BLP violation here.

If he is notable then the contested material seems valid. Whether the subject wants the material to be on Wikipedia is not something we worry about.

If he's not notable then we should not have an article on him at all. Any editor who thinks this (or that  the article should be deleted for any other reason) should list the article at  WP:AFD so that the communiity can decide.

If he's notable but only because of the incident then WP:SINGLEEVENT comes into play. A case might be made that this falls under WP:PSEUDO, but one of the cited sources discusses Ravi in more than passing, starting off with "He is being defended by perhaps Singapore's most prominent defense lawyer, M Ravi. Sometimes, it seems that the defendant in every high-profile death penalty or free expression case in the city-state is represented by M Ravi." and continuing for three paragraphs. I think he's notable and the material should stay. Meters (talk) 07:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * M Ravi 2019 .jpg