Talk:Maastricht Aachen Airport/2004-2009

Article listed on Votes for deletion July 4 to July 12 2004, consensus was to keep and list on cleanup. Discussion:

Looks like a cut-and-paste, maybe FAA. Non-encyclopedic like the Aarhus Airport article up for deletion. - Lucky 6.9 05:58, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * only if the faa has started writing in flemish. no vote.--Samuel J. Howard 06:31, Jul 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Send to Cleanup. Why is this here? It's a perfectly encyclopedic topic, just a junk article. Ambivalenthysteria 06:30, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Cleanup. See also WikiProject Airports. --Zigger 06:49, 2004 Jul 4 (UTC)
 * Give the airport nuts a shot at it. Keep for now. -- Cyrius|✎ 21:02, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, I will make certain that this gets cleaned up. Burgundavia 01:15, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Needs a clean-up, but this looks like a moderately well-used local airport rather than an obscure and quiet airstrip, so keep. Average Earthman 12:39, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

End discussion

Concensus on "promotional" names?
Question: in the destination guide for MAA provided here, terminology used by Ryanair is used for destinations e.g. Girona-Barcelona and Pisa-Florence. However, since Wikipedia isn't promotional should we use only the official names for airports (thus e.g. London-Stansted since this is an official name, however not Pisa-Florence but simply Pisa). LightPhoenix (talk) 15:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I think Pisa-Florence is best, WikiProject Airports/page content lists 'London-Heathrow' as an example, not just 'London' Rpvdk (talk) 12:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That's because London has multiple airports (Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Luton and City). Pisa is marketed as Florence some time for commercial purposes, but in the end it's Pisa airport (it's not called Pisa-Florence airport on WP), and not Florence. Changed. BabyNuke (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)