Talk:Macrolepiota clelandii/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 18:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Happy to offer a review. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * "According to Else Vellinga, Australian collections labeled Macrolepiota konradii,[6] M. gracilenta, M. mastoidea,[7] and M. procera are synonymous with Macrolepiota clelandii." I defer to your knowledge of the technical terminology, but is "synonymous" strictly correct, here? The names aren't synonymous, the collections were simply misidentified? Similarly, I assume it was not "demonstrated that the taxa were the same species" but that certain collections (IE, Australasian) erroneously identified as the various taxa were shown to be the same species.
 * My wording was poor, have reworked this part. Sasata (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I think "species concept" is jargon, as is "sister".
 * Both are now linked. Sasata (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The microscopic details paragraph is a bit choppy
 * C/e'd a bit. Sasata (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Why "West Australia" and not "Western Australia"?
 * Fixed. Sasata (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The location is wrong on your Phillips source.
 * Fixed. Sasata (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Images and sources all look great. No stability or neutrality issues. It looks like you've covered all the literature... Key questions are answered. Not much more to say! Please double-check my copyedits. (The lead image is one of JJ's- too small for FPC, but I'll let him know that the article's seen expansion.) Josh Milburn (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I think I've taken care of your concerns in this edit. Sasata (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Great- no further comments. Promoting now. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)