Talk:Mad Catz/Archive 1

Critisism
That whole part seems to be completely biased and only refects on their N64 controller. Wikipedia is not a place to vent your frustrations. Plus, the article cited doesn't say anything about the company loosing money due to shoddy products. Infact, the guys from Reviews on the Run/Electric Playground are very (sorry but I can't cite this) pro-Mad Catz. Personally, I am too. But anyway, I'm erasing it, and anybody who thinks that they can cite sources on that and expand on true critisims, by all means, go for it. --- Silent RAGE! 09:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Does anyone else think the comment "the cheapest products and break easily" is just someone who got a bit wound up when they broke their Mad Catz controller? Either way, it's innapropriate and poorly worded, so I am deleting it.

I've had pretty shoddy luck with a few of their products personally. There are more, but I can't think of them right now. After all that mess, I've stopped buying from them. 24.40.172.245 14:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC) I'm considering removing the overly long list(s) and moving them into a "list of products" section, thoughts? As is, the article is hard to read; the listings seem like an attempt to keep it from being a stub --69.247.164.232 20:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The N64 controller - analogue stick wore out very quickly, some buttons were a bit loose
 * a multi-system RF adaptor - contact pins were misaligned out of the box, very difficult to get a color signal
 * PlayStation 2 memory cards - I/O speed decreased gradually until finally the card became intermittently write-only or even completely inaccessible within a couple of months

Madcatz Nintendo GameCube Memory Cards do not work with the Nintendo Wii. --Zathic 01:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hell, they don't even work with the GameCube. GaeMFreeK 00:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I have steared away from Mad Catz products also seeing that most of them are hit-or-miss in functionality. While I encourage people to write reviews and even post opinions on Wikipedia, I still expect Wikipedia's neutrality standards to be upheld if anyone is going to take articles seriously(as depending on them for unbiased facts).

I'm not here to say we should run rampant with our problems, I'm just here to agree with the others that citations are necessary and to add in my two cents that while some of this company's products work, some of them don't; I happen to be getting the ones that don't work.

BH March 11, '08, 5:13 AM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.153.255.178 (talk) 10:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Gamecube memory cards and controllers. GBA link cables. Pretty much everything of theirs I bought broke a year later. - 75.135.79.139 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Madcatz logo.jpg
Image:Madcatz logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Article is poorly written and biased
This article is very biased and badly worded. I suspect that this comes from editing of this article by MadCatz employees and immature persons angered at them. I strongly suggest reverting to the April 25 18:15 revision and adding back in a little from the newest revision. --Pjvandehaar (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and made the revert. I'd restore some of the new content, except that it is unsourced. I'll try to re-add some of the content after I dig up some sources. Thanks, ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 02:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Changes to company
http://www.madcatz.com/games/

mad catz has now changed their logo and produces (or has a hand in through their pherical production) a few games

for example ....damage inc squadrons of WW2(of witch their is no page for just yet) was bundled with the mad catz joystick for a time .....the game itself though is nothing more than a ps3 update of heroes of the pacific (the missions are exactly the same with poorer story acting and a few changes ..but the overall game is ok .....but this isnt a review so i wont go into further detail) and was probly produced simply for this purpose

Tony Spike (talk) 02:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)tony spikeTony Spike (talk) 02:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

major re-write of article
I've rewritten the Mad Catz article, primarily in writing a more fleshed-out company history. I am an employee of Mad Catz (though I do not work in marketing nor public relations), and welcome your criticisms and thoughts in improving the article. I believe I've maintained NPOV and have sourced the article satisfactorily, but am eager to know your thoughts and opinions. Jrimorin (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)