Talk:Madame Defarge

Revert
KAyLiE4kAyLiE: The reason for the revert was due to the fact that the personality section was simply a long, long essay. There is nothing wrong in there being a character analysis section for Madame Defarge, but writings on Wikipedia should be as concise as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dthomsen8 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Untitled
As suggestions: quotes are not necessary, although even if you chose to retain a selection, the citation in parentheses should not be page numbers, since different editions of the same book exist. I would suggest something like "Book the Third, Chapter 3."

2.7182V 06:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The second and third paragraphs seem to be taken from Sparknotes: http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/twocities/canalysis.html. We should change this to avoid volating copyrights. 128.208.60.88 (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've removed them. --Pixelface (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted by a bot to as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted by a bot to as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Popular culture
In the science fiction television series, Defiance, there is a character, Stahma Tarr. She seems to have most of the cleverness in their union but is outwardly merely a good wife to her powerful husband. Near the end of the episode, A Well Respected Man, after she had successfully manipulated the politics of the city for her husband to fill a vacant spot on the town council, she is seen knitting or doing some type of alien crochet why making an exquisitely subtle but clever remark to the lawman of the town. Given her character and that she was knitting seems to be a reference to Madame Defarge.Halconen (talk) 18:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Off-topic chat
Madame Defarge as a victim

It seems obvious that madame Defarge should be wieved and portrayed as a victim. More specifically of marquis d´Evremonde(= "marquis Anyone") He is the true villain of the piece whos evil makes itself felt even after his own death. Therese Defarge should be seen as an Antagonist as opposed to a Villain. Who could go through what she has suffered without becoming hard and vengeful? Her actions towards Charles and Lucie should not be defended - but well Herself! The l´Ancien regim as described by Dickens explicitly only reaps the harvest that they themselves has sown! Miss Pross becoming permanently deaf must be seen as a divine punishment for her role in madame Defarges death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.130.31.203 (talk) 11:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * This article talk page is for discussing improvements to the article, not for general discussion of the article's topic. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 12:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)