Talk:Made in China 2025

Section in lead removed
"The 3rd paragraph, the one about the response of the Trump Administration to Made in China 2025, is inaccurate, misleading, and selective in terms of source reference, probably written by a biased non-native English speaker judging by the grammar mistakes. It is corrected and revised based on official documents and publications."

It was probabaly written by me, a non-native English speaker. Thank you in advance if you can correct grammar mistakes of English language. But "corrected and revised" by removing the whole section and claim as "inaccurate, misleading and selective" is not really appropriate. Opinion can be shared here, as long as it is well supported by the source. This is a "Free" Encyclopedia. Otherwise, I can also call you an innocent biased reader, or even worse, maybe from the U.S. cyber troll army. All the sources used are listed here, please explain which one, and how those are biased, or wrong narrated.

--WWbread (Open Your Mouth?) 22:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Right. Major changes should be discussed. What about a section 'Actual discussion', though WP is not a newspaper, these occurencies will have a longterm impact (longer than a presidency). AVS (talk) 06:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Charles K. Kao
CKK has never lived in Taiwan. Also, as of 2016, he wasn't really capable of contributing anything due to his illness. I think the statement in Taiwan section is wrong. texnic (talk) 23:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Section of reactions removed
@The Account 2 Thank you for reviewing this article. I noticed you removed part of the U.S. reactions because it is "not related to made in China 2025 per se." The section removed was part of the U.S. policy response to Made in China 2025 per the Congressional Research Service. I plan to revise and show the U.S. policy response to the MIC25 when I put them back. Please let me know if you have any concerns about this approach. Thank you. Path2space (talk) 20:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)