Talk:Madison, Wisconsin/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: AmericanAir88 (talk · contribs) 21:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

I will be taking on the review for this city. It seems that there are an alarming amount of issues present such as citation needed tags. Unfortunately, there is plenty of unsourced and choppy areas of the article. As a result of the citation issues and structure of the article, I am closing the review as a Immediate ❌. Feel free to nominate this in the future, but honestly, this was a very premature nomination. Please read the GA criteria before nominating. The citation issues and tags should be an indication that the article is not ready for promotion. Thank you. AmericanAir88(talk) 22:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Major issues

 * Several [citation needed] tags.
 * Copy violation Please see This

Unsourced areas

 * Last sentence of "creation" needs a citation
 * Second paragraph of "Expansion" needs citations
 * "1960s and 1970s" needs a bunch of more citations
 * First and last paragraph of "geography" needs citations
 * "Neighborhoods" needs more citations
 * "Architecture" needs a ton of more citations.
 * "Major commercial areas" is almost entirely unsourced.
 * "Climate" needs an additional source
 * Intro to "Demographics" needs a source
 * "Religion" needs a ton of sourcing
 * "Economy" needs sourcing
 * "Performing arts" needs sourcing
 * "Last paragraph of "Politics" needs sourcing
 * "Sports", "former teams", and "Amateur sports" needs sourcing
 * The intro to "Government" needs sources.
 * "Print" needs sourcing
 * "Radio" needs sourcing
 * "TV" needs sourcing
 * Second paragraph of "railways" needs sourcing
 * "Highways" has no citations

Issues

 * Dates need to be organized into just mdy
 * "21st century" needs expansion
 * "Points of interest" is literally a list with no sourcing or explanation
 * "2010 census" should reuse the census source that is presented at the beginning
 * "Nightlife" is highly promotional
 * Bare urls
 * Caps in the references