Talk:Madonna Live: The Virgin Tour/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Crowz  RSA  22:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Lead

 * Released by Warner Music Video on November 13, 1985, — shouldn't it be through, not by
 * Works fine.
 * it contains a concert date from The Virgin Tour, filmed at Cobo Arena in Detroit, Michigan on May 25, 1985. — It doesn't ACTUALLY contain a date, so shouldn't it be contains footage from a concert date or something.
 * Reworded.
 * Madonna got busy with the recording — busy doesn't sound like the best word here, perhaps something like Madonna started recording.
 * Correct.
 * The performance of "Angel", — performance should be plural
 * Oops.
 * performance was not strong in them. — strong? consider rewording.
 * Reworded.
 * was certified gold — i'm pretty sure there should be an a after certified.
 * I'm afraid not, its always written as "certified [gold/platinum/diamond/silver]".
 * I'll review some more tomorrow. Crowz  RSA  22:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing the article CrowzRSA. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 03:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Background

 * Madonna got busy with the recording of her third studio album — busy doesn't sound like the best word here, perhaps something like Madonna started recording.
 * Add link to Director (Film director)
 * and shooting for the film Shanghai Surprise — Add what genre the video is (it's a comedy film)
 * It portrayed Madonna in her first image makeover, with platinum blond curls, and conservative wardrobe. — things like makeover and wardrobe should be linked.
 * The performance of "Angel", — performance should be plural
 * performance was not strong in them. — strong? consider rewording.
 * Add link to music video
 * Corrected all. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 11:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Reception
No problems here.

Track listing

 * It was released on VHS and later on Laserdisc, to this date no DVD release has been announced. It was also released as part of a three VHS box set The Madonna Collection in 2000. — Is there a ref for this?
 * Yes. Rooksby has a tracklisting section at the end of his book, so has Morton. Used Rooksby though. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 05:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Result

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (No OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Crowz RSA  22:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Crowz RSA  22:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Crowz RSA  22:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Crowz RSA  22:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)