Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Reconrabbit Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.

Prose

 * Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. ✅
 * Following the initial copy-edit, there are no contradictory or confusing sentences I've found. ✅

Images

 * All images are tagged with licenses. ✅
 * The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.
 * There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.

Stability, neutrality, focus

 * There are no edit wars, content disputes in the article's recent history. No maintenance tags on the article either. ✅
 * Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. ✅
 * Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. ✅
 * The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles?
 * I was viewing it on a very wide screen before. It looks better with smaller aspect ratio. It's doing no harm keeping it in and doesn't go against MOS:TABLE. It's out of the scope of this review. Recon  rabbit  01:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)