Talk:Mae Young Classic (2017)

Requested move 25 June 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC) TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

WWE Mae Young Classic → Mae Young Classic – clearer name for the article and it would not use redirections. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.  JTP (talk • contribs) 22:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Yeah: I see other WWE events don't have WWE in their titles, like Royal Rumble, so I should have not put WWE at the beginning. Not sure why I did. Guess I wasn't thinking at the time.PeterMan844 (talk) 11:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

I didn't realise this page existed actually when I went to Mae Young Classic it was a redirection page, so I created a new page from scratch. It covers a lot of the details here and might actually include some more information, so there is actually a page at Mae Young Classic now.Stuxmusic (talk) 13:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support I added the live finals special to the List of WWE Network events page. I'll change the link once this page gets redirected. OldSkool01 (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * WWE Mae Young Classic and Mae Young Classic both have long histories. Should they be history-merged? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Question Re:"Spoilers"
Hello, I just have a quick question. Obviously this entire tournament (minus the final) took place already, but it is not actually being televised until late next month. I'm just curious what the official protocol on Wiki is in terms of events such as this that take place one day but are not "officially" shown until a later date. So my question, should the full results in the bracket actually been shown in this article, or should they be hidden behind some form of a "spoilers" barrier that you have to specifically click on if you wish to see the results? I ask because I am trying my best to avoid spoilers on this, as I know lots of other WWE fans are, and I did notice that the full results were put up here without any warning, so somebody looking for some info on the tournament but not results may have this whole thing spoiled for them (I quickly scrolled away the moment I noticed before seeing anything, thankfully.) If what I'm saying is completely against typical Wiki protocol, that's fine, this is why I'm asking because I'm not sure. My own personal feeling is that tape-delayed results should not be released on Wiki until they are officially done so by the sponsoring body, in this case specifically meaning that the results of this tournament shouldn't be shown here until it is actually televised on WWE Network next month. Bobharris1989 (talk) 02:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I know. I already know the 2 people who are going to the finals but I don't want to know now. Vrgr2156 (talk) 02:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:SPOILERS - as long as there are reliable sources spoilers are allowed on Wikipedia, despite personal feelings etc. That is the guideline  MPJ  -DK 15:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * understood, thanks for the info! Bobharris1989 (talk) 21:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd love for Wikipedia to be spoiler free myself, but that ain't a fight I can win.  MPJ  -DK 22:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

They're allowed, but do we have to have them? I think it does way more harm than good. --78.62.181.245 (talk) 20:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)