Talk:Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller (ship)

Update on full loads/gantry cranes
"Initially, she was forced to operate well under her maximum cargo capacity, as most ports certified to handle Triple E class vessels currently lack gantry cranes tall enough to fully load the ship.[8]" Is the ship able to operate fully loaded currently? Gantry cranes update, number of ports able to service this large ship?09:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Yen10k (talk)

Title
Why does this article use "Mærsk" instead of "Maersk"? -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that that is actually the way that Maersk styles their name. Actually, it is not. You're welcome to fix that if you want. I checked their website, and that's not how they stylized it. But one tip- check The Manual of Style first. I may be missing the point here... but...  Maccore Henni  Mii! Pictochat Mii! 00:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * And actually now that I think about it maybe the ship is stylized that way?  Maccore Henni  Mii! Pictochat Mii! 00:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I added a clean up tag. I'm not sure whats going on.  Maccore Henni  Mii! Pictochat Mii! 00:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you look at the photos of the name on the ship itself, they use $⟨æ⟩$. What's going on is the company has long simplified things by using the more internationally compatible $⟨ae⟩$ in the company name, logos, etc.  But the ship is named specifically after a person, and they have preserved the original Danish form.  The current distribution of spellings on the WP articles seems correct.  — ˈzɪzɨvə (talk) 08:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * While sources seem to use the non-English characters for Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller himself, I'm not seeing that for the ship. I've moved the article. 162 etc. (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)