Talk:Magic hypercubes

Page translated from my dutch version I didn't want to disturb the perfectly ok magic hypercube entry, so I posted this under the plural. This page gives an overview of the research of the past decades done by me and other magic hypercube enthousiasts (or mathemagicians) Errors in wikification and or formulae (some of which were reformulated for these articles and not yet on my website) will be corrected in the next few weeks. As well as some corrections / additions to noticed stubbs / articles.

Aale de Winkel 13:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I added a See also section (with a link to Nasik magic hypercubes --Harvey Heinz 23:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to correct english spelling mistakes, contents please refrain from changing it without at least notifying it here. Though everything here is solidly defined, making mayor changes might interfere with the intended introductory nature of this article. The nature of this subject, a few minor things are in ongoing dispute. Mentioning this does not go against NOR-principles I reckon, discussions are merely about some names (pe perfect/nasik). Other things are mentioned as being "beyond the scope of this article", but still solidly defined.

Aale de Winkel 07:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

TO THE INTERESTED READER
The two articles magic hyperbeam and magic hypercubes are puny introductions to a vast field of research. Introduced notions are explained in the article context and offer a notation to keep things manageable. Though special characters have arbitrarily chosen meaning, they are implemented in hypercube / beam constructing programs.

Aale de Winkel 11:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Merged to magic hypercube
The confusion from having two separate articles of different detail levels for the same subject, separated only by a plural, was not good. I have merged all the content from magic hypercubes to magic hypercube, retaining all the detail. If in future it is deemed necessary to have two articles with differing levels of detail, please use a name that conveys the distinction in detail. -- Brhaspati\talk/contribs 14:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)