Talk:Magnetic photon

I can sympathize with ranking this as 'low', but since Landau & Lifshitz classic QM text refers to "electric photons" and "magnetic photons", can't we raise the priority a little bit? Enough, say, to include the description in terms of angular momentum (polarization) and parity? Or even to explain why only electric photons are physical? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.119.233.212 (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 71.205.35.148 (talk) 14:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I've reduced the priority to mid, reserving high priority for particles that are part of current mainstream theories. No disagreement with you adding the other things you suggest.  Djr32 (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)