Talk:Mahākāśyapa

Early texts
This is an appalling article. There are dozens of early texts that feature Mahakassapa, as well as an extensive legendary biogrpahy, all of which are ignored in this article, which uses only very late east Asian sources, which have nothing to do with the historical figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.28.32 (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mahākāśyapa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://dl-gamma.tccd.edu/academic/booklets/sp07/PHIL_1304.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050207050616/http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/bps/wheels/wheel345.html to http://accesstoinsight.org/lib/bps/wheels/wheel345.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Content that was too much
This content was removed from the article because there was not enough space left in the article for it:
 * On a similar note, the robe, which in the early accounts was a rag-robe, is a symbol of rebirth and In this context, the rag-robe was also associated in several Asian cultures with gestation, birth, rebirth, impermanence: rag-robes have historically been associated much with death, and in the early texts, the robe came from a corpse. In a late Pāli account, the same robe is also associated with birth, an association that has also been found in the fieldwork of anthropologist François Bizot, done in Cambodian temples. On a similar note, from the fourteenth century onward, Japanese esoteric kirigami texts describe the robe transmitted from Gautama Buddha to Mahākāśyapa as a symbol of birth and gestation.p=220–221}}South-east Asian scholar Paul Mus (1902–1969) compared the transmittance of the robe of Gautama Buddha to Maitreya Buddha with Indian consecration rituals for kings, in which a king's robe is equated with the placenta, through which rebirth takes place.


 * In one early discourse, he was asked by Pāyāsi, a philosopher with materialist teachings, why virtuous Buddhist monks do not commit suicide. Since they have done much good karma, and since Buddhists believe in an afterlife in which this karma gives fruit, he argued, why not go there straight away? Mahākāśyapa responded that virtuous monks would not do that, because they live with compassion for other people, and do much good by teaching them: their purpose "is gained by life".
 * In some early texts, accounts of Mahākāśyapa and Bhadra's previous lives are told, which illustrate how they vowed to lead celibate lives. In one life, they were making love in a forest and disturbed a pratyekabuddha (paccekabuddha) who was living and meditating there. When they discovered they had broken his meditative concentration, they felt so ashamed they took a vow together that from then onward, they would be reborn without sexual desire. In another life, in the time of the previous Buddha Padumuttara, he was born in a wealthy family and was called Videha. He saw a disciple of Patumuttara Buddha who was declared to be eminent in ascetic practices, and wanted to be like him in a future life. In subsequent lives, he strove to achieve this aim by doing meritorious deeds, which involved offering robes and cloaks to Buddhas and pratyekabuddhas.