Talk:Maia Sandu

Disputed tag
We are seeing the first sparks of an edit war over whether the disputed tag should be included in the infobox under the PM position of Maia Sandu. Please do not engage in edit warring and constructively give your opinions and reasoning as to why you want to Keep or Delete the small disputed mention.
 * Keep. The 2019 Moldovan constitutional crisis is ongoing, and the disputed tag is the best reflection of the crisis. Pilaz (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

RfC lead image
Just out of curiosity I was wondering on everyone's comments about the article's lead image? I created a new cropped image which, in my opinion, think would be better as a lead image. Thoughts? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't see any issue with the image you created TDKR Chicago 101. I support using this image as the lead image in this article. Are there any trademark issues with the original image you used to create the one you propose using? Jurisdicta (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Controversies section
The whole Controversies section seems very biased. I added her response in the case of the accusations regarding Antonescu. I also removed poorly sourced paragraphs about the "Open Dialog Foundation" and about the alledged charges of fraud regarding the baccalaureate security cameras. The sources telegraph.md, politics.md, actualitati.md and are obscure websites which produce very politically charged and poorly sourced "news". I did not check the sources for the other controversies. The entire Controversies section resembles an electoral smear campaign and in my opinion shouldn't belong to a Wikipedia article. Fandango7 (talk) 03:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)