Talk:Maine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 03:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Seeing as this was a drive-by review from a sockpuppet editor, I'll be quick failing this. Going to leave some constructive comments if another editor would care to bring this up to GA standards in the future:


 * Two citation needed tags in the Etymology section, along with some unreferenced (or under-referenced) sections throughout the article.
 * The history section is very lean on post-1820 history, with no mention of the 20th and 21st century at all. Surely Maine hasn't been frozen in a time capsule for all this time?
 * Geography section needs a lot more referencing. Ditch the quote and list of national parks (prose is much better and should describe the natural setting or surroundings of each).
 * Demographics section has too many tables that aren't supplemented by prose. Also missing references for the ethnicity of immigrants.
 * Economy section needs a bit less emphasis on shipbuilding (which is unreferenced), either in the form of a trim or adding content on other major industries.
 * Transportation section has no mention of local public transportation (or inter-city buses) and needs references.
 * The detailed information on municipalities should be split off into a separate list.
 * Culture section is all lists, when it should be prose.

Cheers.  Sounder Bruce  03:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)