Talk:Mak Erot

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mak Erot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516081953/http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/02/26/big-deal.html to http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/02/26/big-deal.html
 * Added tag to http://www.cosmo.com.br/brasilemundo/integra.asp?id=217884
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080717045608/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5idJ21eyGmIBmdt0IsGrzuDqDbPgw to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5idJ21eyGmIBmdt0IsGrzuDqDbPgw

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for Deletion, October 2023
I am nominating this page for speedy deletion as it meets the DB-person criterion. Reliable sources on this person are difficult if not impossible to find and they do not appear to be particularly notable, even in their own country. Not to mention, their practices were almost certainly entirely psuedoscience. Just as Wikipedia isn't the place for an editor's random theories, it isn't a place for this either. To preempt any arguments on it, the existence of a few unheard-of films and a handful of articles don't illustrate encyclopedic notability.

I don't believe this page would ever have been created under the modern article creation process. Foxtrot620 (talk) 05:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The standard for WP:A7 is not notability, but a credible claim of significance or importance. The very fact that coverage in reliable sources is present means that the article has such a credible claim. -- Whpq (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)