Talk:Make Room for Lisa/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  15:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images anyway, so we're golden
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images anyway, so we're golden
 * No images anyway, so we're golden


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Wikilink the characters in the plot section (Marge, Homer etc)
 * Remember to have sentences with quotes end with citations

That's really it. Nice work! As always, I'll place the review on hold for seven days, though I know you'll get to it before then :)  R uby2010   comment!  15:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I think I've fixed all the problems now. As always, thanks for the review! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Pass for GA.  R uby2010   comment!  16:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)