Talk:Malappuram district/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 16:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination, as it is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria.
 * Multiple unsourced portions and a lot of original research:
 * 1) "The district has some importance..."
 * 2) "The district of Malappuram was formed..."
 * 3) "In the 2011 census..."
 * 4) "Tamil is also been..."
 * 5) "Many hospitals function..."
 * 6) "Besides these, there are 120..."
 * 7) The whole 'Geography', 'Culture' section, and many more.
 * Statements like "Modern medicine, Ayurveda, and Homeopathy are available in the district." seem like advertisement.
 * The images and captions seem like state tourism advertisement.
 * Some images are placed in wrong location.
 * Whole 'Places of Interest' section is advertisement.
 * Lots of MoS and grammar issues.

Request for copyedit at WP:GOCE. Refer to the previous review also. When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.—  ❯❯❯  S A H A   16:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)