Talk:Male-to-female transsexual

Redirect
This article duplicates content at the synonymous page trans woman. Propose reinstating the redirect. Will follow up if there's no discussion in 7 days. Jokestress (talk) 00:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I support reinstating the redirect; if Special:Contributions/76.221.70.13 or others are unhappy with the title of the existing article, Trans woman, they should propose changing the name of that article rather than just starting up a wholly parallel article... one which will a be a major pain to police and maintain in parallel. Thank you! -- bonze blayk (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This article should be redirected.Please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. As it stands right now, this article meets the requirements for speedy deletion because this article  duplicates an existing topic See #a10. Planetary Chaos Redux (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Please reconsider, based on your own criterion. Trans woman was a redirect from Male-to-Female Transsexual. Additionally, the text indicates that the term Transwoman is only prefered by "some." Therefore, the preferred term, as well as the medfical term is Male-to-Female Transsexual. These two concepts are exclusive and should be separate strings. By far, the vast majority of this group does not identify themselves as "transwomen." You are foisting a title upon us by this redirect! This is happening because some isolated individuals understand the Wikipedia manipulations better than others. Please advise how to contact the member who recently redirected my redirected text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.70.13 (talk) 16:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Clear subject split, so I've redirected - whatever the title should be, we do not solve that disagreement by having two articles, one with each title. If anyone wants to argue for a new title, please take it to WP:RM -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)