Talk:Male pregnancy

Suspected original research
I’m suspecting the section for humans may have original research. I can’t say if this is the case because I haven’t looked through the sources yet. I’ll check and see later. CycoMa (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

"A rat model of pregnancy in the male parabiont"
so, acording to this paper https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.09.447686v2 reported in the daily mail https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9696597/Chinese-scientists-force-male-rats-BIRTH.html, there now has been an experiment where a castrated male rat and a female rat where grafted onto each other and an uterus transplanted into the male rat, with the result being (a low rate of) successfull pregnancies. Does this warrant inclusion?`If yes, pleasde include. --1234567891011a (talk) 14:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Utterly bizarre phrasing
“Given that males do not require a uterus to survive”

What is the point of this and why does it specify “males”?

Would it not be better to say “Given that humans do not require a uterus to survive”? 2600:1700:BA0:FC40:3DCA:DE5B:D180:E408 (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

A male has had a baby!
A man had two children one being male and the other being female! Its true, Male can have babies! 151.200.27.219 (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)