Talk:Malibou Lake, California

--Malibou (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)I'm working on getting more relevant links to the article.

Untitled

 * Hi. Yes, I've been keeping an eye on this article. It probably wouldn't have met the required notability standards for inclusion in Wikipedia if it wasn't for the filming location issue, so I'd try to find as many good sources referring to that as possible.


 * If you haven't already looked at it, I'd recommend reading this: Your first article. It gives lots of useful advice. The important thing though is to remember that this is an encyclopaedia, and articles must be neutral, rather than looking like an advertisement. From the name you've chosen, I assume you have a connection with Lake Malibou, which is not usually seen as a good thing when writing an article (see WP:COI) though if you keep everything well-sourced and neutral, you'll probably be ok. Don't forget that others can edit the article too, so if there are dark secrets about the lake you'd rather not let out, you might want to reconsider starting the article - only kidding, I'm sure there aren't too many corpses on the lakebed!


 * You will probably need some help in formatting the links and references properly, but that can wait for now. The important thing is to find the references. I'll maybe have a quick look myself, to see if I can find any via Google, and maybe on Wikipedia itself. If I do, I'll post them here. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:01, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * A few links I've found:
 * The only direct mention of the lake I can find on Wikipedia is in relation to The Black Waters of Echo's Pond, which was recently filmed there.
 * More on the Frankenstein connection: http://frankensteinia.blogspot.com/2009/09/exclusive-return-to-malibou-lake-by.html This is a blog, so not ideal as a source, but it is a useful confirmation. The Frankenstein (1931 film) article doesn't mention the lake at the moment, but it would probably be possible to add it, if there is a good enough source to confirm this.
 * A useful-looking L.A. Times article: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/nov/04/local/me-then4: but you've already found this one, I see. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Spelling Though we all know 'Malibu' is spelt M-A-L-I-B-U, Malibou Lake is not, never has been, and only is erroneously. Someone needs to change all of the MALIBU LAKE references. It is confusing, and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malibou_Lake should be the main article. Seanydelight (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Seanydelight

MASH
Hi and thank you for your help. I did find in wiki, "M*A*S*H" a reference about a movie set near malibu in the santa monica mountains, but it does not say precisely Lake Malibou. Can I use that? I did add few relevant refferences. thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malibou (talk • contribs) 01:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The MASH movie (one of my all-time favourites) gets a mention on several of the links you've found, so it can probably go in somehow.
 * There is a Wikipedia film special-interest group: WikiProject Film, and I'll put a note on their talk page about this article: they may be able to find more references to the lake being used for movie-making. What would be ideal would be to include a still from the 1931 Frankenstein movie, with the monster by the lake. There may be copyright problems with this though, so this may not be possible - we have to take great care over copyright. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah! Awesome! I do have a picture from the studio, all they require me to do is to say "Courtesy of so and so". and how do you upload a picture to the article? I tried following instructions but don't seem to be fruitful. Thank you for all your help!--Malibou (talk) 03:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It may be a little more complex than that: basically, the studio would have to release the image into the public domain, which means it could be used anywhere, not just on Wikipedia. It's getting late for me (4.30 AM! -I'm in the UK), so I'll have to look into this tomorrow. Meanwhile, keep looking for sources.


 * One other thing. As I said earlier, your user name makes me wonder if there could perhaps be a conflict-of-interest issue, so it might be as well to clarify this now. Are you directly involved in Lake Malibou in some way? Working for someone who owns property there, or something like that? If so, it will be best to explain this now, rather than have the question unanswered. I think you've done enough to justify the article without this being a major problem, but it may put peoples minds at rest. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

answer to your question
No, I work for no one who owns property there. I'm not involved with lake malibou in any ways.hope this is sufficent. thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malibou (talk • contribs) 06:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Great - it was the name you chose that made me wonder. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Picture or still
You will not believe this! the picture you said that would be "IDEAL", Frankenstein and the girl by Lake Malibou is PUBLIC DOMAIn and free to use. Good night--Malibou (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That simplifies everything. Actually, it occurred to me that a 1931 film is probably out of copyright by now anyway, though I'm not 100% sure about this.


 * I'll check into the procedure for downloading pictures - I've not done this myself yet. It would be nice to get another more recent picture too, but that can wait. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Category
Glad to see things simplified! :) What would you suggest category wise for this article? THX--Malibou (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll check into that, when I get a chance. I've found 'Category:Filming locations' with a quick search, so I'll add that one. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added a category, and moved the page, as the official site and LA Times article list the place as Malibou Lake and not Lake Malibou. Some good sources in there too!  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Good point about the name: I'd not spotted that. Thanks, Lugnuts. BTW, are you more clued-up on uploading images than me? (this wouldn't be difficult) - I think Malibou may need some help, with the Frankenstein image discussed above. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know too much about images and copyright, TBH! Of the few I've uploaded myself, most of them have been ones I've taken.  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Image of Frankenstein and the girl by the water
It's looking good. I have changed "Malibu" to "Malibou" in History. also, can we upload the famous Image of Frankenstein and the girl Maria by the Lake, copyrights are cleared. Article creator. --Malibou (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Malibou Lake Pictures
I'm going today on location and shout some pictures of the Malibou Lake, which will be free of any copyrights. maybe we could use them on the article. I will upload them pictures and you guys will let me know what you think! thx --Malibou (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If you can find the spot where the Frankenstein still was taken, that would be ideal. We'd best not overload the article with images, but see what you can come up with. AndyTheGrump (talk)

Notable residents
I think that this should be 'Notable former residents'?

We should probably be wary of naming any current residents, unless this is widely-reported elsewhere, per WP:BLP policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Perhaps we should make a decision about this here. Given that this is a relatively small location, noting current residents might be considered a breach of privacy, even if we can find sources that state this. I'd suggest that we limit the list to former residents only. What do others think? AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

I do have a shot of the place where the scene from Frankenstein was shot. I'm uploading it, it's the closest that I could get to it, from a little different angle. I shot this picture today with my camera, it's free of any copyrights.--Malibou (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Still uploaded
I did upload a still of the Frankenstein lake scene. file name is: Malibou lake 16 (2). jpg blake and white. jpg. I hope you can find it. --Malibou (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Please provide the urls of the two imgs. With the info provided above I could not locate the imgs. Thanks.-- Nvvchar . 07:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The film still is A frankenstein.jpg. Unfortunately, as it stands we can't use it yet as copyright status hasn't yet been made clear. Malibou stated earlier that it was public domain, but we'd probably have to get sourced confirmation of this. I'm not sure about US copyright law, but possibly since the film was released in 1931 it may automatically be out of copyright? AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Frankenstein still, Public domain.
The Frankenstein still is public domain as I stated before, I did already do my homework. sorry, you could not find my uploads. but, if you google the image, there should be one available. --Malibou (talk) 15:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The still seems to have been uploaded already ( File:A frankenstein.jpg ). The problem is that we may need verifiable evidence that it is public domain - we really do need to take care over copyright. I'll try to find out more though. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've asked a question about this here: Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems. Hopefully we can get this sorted out, as it will be a real bonus to the article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The cutoff date for public domain material in the US is 1923, so this is not automatically public domain because of its age. It is theoretically possible that copyright was not renewed or Universal Studios released the movie into the public domain, but if that were the case I am sure we would have heard about it. The file seems to have been uploaded as non-free content with any form of rationale. As it does not seem to meet the wp:NFCC for use on Malibu Lake (it is easily replacable by a free image of the lake) there is no choice but deletion. Malibou, why do think this image is public domain? Yoenit (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Image public domain
It was given to me by Author. Brian Rooney, who wrote the book "Three Magical Miles", about the history of Lake Malibou. He, verified the copyright's information about the image, and confirmed to me that now the famouse picture is public domain. I'm guessing that the studio released it to the public.--Malibou (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This review of the book states the image is "courtesy of Universal Pictures". If Universal has released this it into the public domain we need to verify it (see Requesting copyright permission) or find some evidence that the image is public domain (such as Universal hosting the image on their site and labeling it public domain). Until we receive such permission we unfortunately can't use the image. Yoenit (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Today's Image of the famouse place where Frankenstein drowned Maria
I also went on location last sunday and shot a still of the spot where the famouse scene took place. I did upload it to wikipedia. is that of any importance??? The still is a bit shot from a different angle, that was as close as I could possibly get to it. --Malibou (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I am gonna need to know under which license do you want to release it, so I can update the file description page accordingly. Yoenit (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I own the picture
I own and shot the picture and I'm This article creator. what kind of license do you need? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.129.56.65 (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you want to release it into the public domain or under a CC-BY-SA license. (There are other options, but these are the most common). Yoenit (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Photo Release
Hi! Yes I'm releasing the image under the CC-By-SA License. What else do we need to do? and did you locate the still of the image I uploaded to wikipedia, or do I need to re-upload it again? thank you for your contribution.--Malibou (talk) 02:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * There we go! File:Malibu lake blake and white.jpg. Yoenit (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Picture
Are you going to upload it to the article? never mind, I see it there! thx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.135.239 (talk) 21:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. On a sidenote, could you please stop making a new section for every reply? Just click the edit button and reply on the bottom of the page. You can use one or more ":" to create indents. Yoenit (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

No problem!--69.235.135.239 (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Do we need more pictures of the lake, I can release more if needed.--69.235.135.239 (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC) I did upload another picture of the entrance of the lake to wiki. File name: Malibou lake's entrance sign. check it out.--Malibou (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Also, another picture named, file: malibu lake picture one.--Malibou (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Also, File name: Malibou lake picture two. --Malibou (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Also, File name: Malibou lake picture 3--Malibou (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Also, File name: M--Malibou (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)alibou lake picture 4 Also, File name: Malibou lake picture 5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malibou (talk • contribs) 22:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Also, Malibou lake picture 6 --Malibou (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC) The following shot is exactly the place where the school scene from the movie, :The Bad Seed" was shot. here it goes: File name: The Bad Seed spot picture--Malibou (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Also, file name: Malibou lake picture 7--Malibou (talk) 22:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC) I release all them pictures to wiki, under the same terms as the first picture "Frankenstein". Have fun!

You guys really let this one go
The former state of this article was nothing to be proud of (misinfo.) i.e. Ronald Reagan did NOT live in Malibou Lake. His ranch is in Malibu Creek State Park. And whoever was trying to explain it's geography went way off even mentioning Thousand Oaks or point Dume. I have a lot of work to do. If anyone should ever actually want to know about Malibou Lake, what I came across here yesterday would have given them more false info than true. Not today, if anyone's noticed. Seanydelight (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Seanydelight

Agree with Seandydelight. I was a neighbor of President Reagan's. He never lived anywhere near Malibou Lake (correct spelling). The most notable part of the Malibou Lake community is not discussed. None of the land is owned in fee by the "homeowners." They own proportionate interest in the "Club" which parcels out the rights to develop and live on the property. This form of ownership makes it very difficult to obtain financing to acquire a home. And you aren't buying a home, only a share of the "Club." This form of homesharecropping also makes it very difficult to modernize the Lake, which is being fouled by leaking septic systems. The operators of the "Club" have, for years, opposed and made more difficult the installation of a sewer system. Maybe the Malibou Lake "Chamber of Commerce" (or similar organization) wrote this article. But it is mostly a complete lie. It should be deleted to be started anew by those without an interest in this bizarre subdivision.

Malibou Lake
In the Discussion section it says that Malibou Lake is "within" Malibu Creek State Park, which is incorrect. It is adjacent to Malibu Creek State Park. How can I edit this section?Reelbeat (talk) 17:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

History merge needed
There seems to have been a copy move from Malibu Lake to this article. A history merge appears to be needed to preserve attribution. —teb728 t c 02:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please file a report at WP:REPAIR so that admins most familiar with fixing cut-and-paste moves can have a look at it. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)