Talk:Malliavin calculus

Integration by parts
I hoped to learn what is this topic about but his article is so terse it makes no sense to me whatsoever. To start, what on the earth has the invariance to do with integration by parts? (= how does the 2nd displayed equation follow from the 1st?) Jmath666 06:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't see what translation invariance of the Lebesgue measure has to do with integration by parts either. SimonL (talk) 20:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Arithmetic Asian options
Why this huge calculation? It seems only marginally relevant. Malliavin calculus has many similar applications; this is just one of many. If anything, one should expand on the original motivation, namely the proof of Hörmander's theorem. Hairer (talk) 23:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malliavin calculus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903171132/http://www.alexschiller.com/media/Thesis.pdf to http://www.alexschiller.com/media/Thesis.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)