Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Right on topic, haven't long finished watching it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

""made a cute on-screen pair" -according to whom? Well?♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Already it's written, "Narasimha Reddy said that Rama Rao and Bhanumathi "made a cute on-screen pair", adding that one cannot imagine anyone else as Nagaraju and Malleswari". Kailash29792 (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Or else Doctor, shall i remove the inverted commas there? I don't think so that removing them would make any difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Nah, I think the quotes can stay as there is no formal/neutral synonym for "cute". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * How about a good on-screen pair? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Article looks to be of sound quality and well documented given the period. Nicely done.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, ! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)