Talk:Malpuech facial clefting syndrome

MEDMOS and RS
I see this article is up for GA. Could I remind chief editor and reviewer that the current structure of the article doesn't follow WP:MEDMOS? There's also quite a few sources that don't seem to meet WP:MEDRS. At the same time, this is a rare condition where it is often necessary to use sources that would be unsuitable in more widely researched topics. JFW &#124; T@lk  21:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm aware that the structure is not explicitly in sync with MEDMOS :) Keep in mind, the review is in its infancy, the article needs additional work, and both reviewer and editor are experienced... but seriously, I might have nominated a bit prematurely. My bad, alone. Thx for being concerned :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Headings
Causes and genetics are sort of the same. We should chose one and go with it. I am fine with either but both are not needed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Give me a MEDMOS-specific reason, or I'll need to push for consensus really donkey-like ;) Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The text says "Causes: Includes Risk factors, triggers, Genetics or genome, Virology (e.g., structure/Morphology, replication)." There is a colon after causes as that is the main section header. Genetics is one of the possible subheadings. However if the article is exclusively genetic than the subheading can reasonably be used instead of the usual heading. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:MEDMOS. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I get that Causes include genetics; but there is an inheritance component to genetics that is not a cause of the disease, therefore I am considering it as merged content per "Some sections will necessarily be absent or may be better merged, especially if the article is not (yet) fully comprehensive". Also, where in MEDMOS is the article forbidden to have an approved section heading further delineate the content by including its MEDMOS-sanctioned sub-terminology? Show me. :)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  06:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)